Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
Oznerol
Posts: 2325
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 6:31 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#706 Post by Oznerol »

Harry wrote: Tue 01 Aug 2023, 11:54 am
Oznerol wrote: Sat 29 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
There is a huge misundertanding among people who believe that all the music videos of the 80's ever existed in some kind of HD masters. Even IF some of them were ever recorded on film (a thing that was not very common. because it was more expensive) 99% of them were EDITED on SD video, so that means that final HD masters of the videos never existed, and never will
My point isn't really about the existence/lack of HD masters though.

I'm sure you're right about music videos being edited on SD video, but my issue with the SMASH Blu-ray is how badly these SD videos are presented, and how clumsy it is to pass SD content through an upscaling process in the way that they have. I don't expect "So hard" and "Domino dancing" to look like "Always on my mind". But, it is very possible, with a limited budget, to do much better.

An example is the Doctor Who Collection Blu-rays, which have been coming out at a rate of three seasons a year since 2018, presenting archive seasons of the show where each episode is a mix of studio shot on video and location shot on film, as was usually the case with British TV until the 1990s. The quality of the remastering, done by a guy called Peter Crocker, is superlative. In many cases the film elements are long gone and all that exist are SD broadcast masters, telerecordings, and various other badly archived sources. They present the episodes in the best possible quality using the full potential of the Blu-ray format, and do not try to falsely "upscale" them to something they have never been. They look as good as if you were watching a brand new broadcast master.

I do think the issue with SMASH is a Parlophone problem. Look at what they have done to "upscale" David Bowie's appearance on the Old Grey Whistle Test, which was shot on video in a TV studio (like Doctor Who) and used to look perfectly good, now it looks like badly rendered CGI: https://youtu.be/IBgU0tiLy2s

It is interesting that Discovery was presented in SD on DVD. Perhaps Parlophone had a go at upscaling it and the results were awful. Somebody looked at the picture quality so I am surprised that they have released SMASH as it is. It's a real shame.

If anyone is still not sure what those of use banging on about bad upscaling mean, have a look at the bridge and the buildings in "So hard" at 00:29: https://youtu.be/6iv8LXZeNTE

You are right on that. There are some examples of original SD stuff tranfered to HD with impressive results, like all the Top Of The Pops presentations recently aired again...really impressive..but I think it all depends really on the quality of that original SD footage. It seems that masters of this quality are not available for everything, sadly...it´s not "all" in the hnads of the person who make the job..altough, in bad hands, you can destroy the quality. I agree that the job done on some PSB videos is terrible.. For many videos, my PopArt DVD looks better in the same TV, than the Smash versions...
This is not my signature.

User avatar
DopeFiend
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat 27 Mar 2021, 11:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#707 Post by DopeFiend »

Oznerol wrote: Sun 06 Aug 2023, 4:33 am
Harry wrote: Tue 01 Aug 2023, 11:54 am
Oznerol wrote: Sat 29 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
There is a huge misundertanding among people who believe that all the music videos of the 80's ever existed in some kind of HD masters. Even IF some of them were ever recorded on film (a thing that was not very common. because it was more expensive) 99% of them were EDITED on SD video, so that means that final HD masters of the videos never existed, and never will
My point isn't really about the existence/lack of HD masters though.

I'm sure you're right about music videos being edited on SD video, but my issue with the SMASH Blu-ray is how badly these SD videos are presented, and how clumsy it is to pass SD content through an upscaling process in the way that they have. I don't expect "So hard" and "Domino dancing" to look like "Always on my mind". But, it is very possible, with a limited budget, to do much better.

An example is the Doctor Who Collection Blu-rays, which have been coming out at a rate of three seasons a year since 2018, presenting archive seasons of the show where each episode is a mix of studio shot on video and location shot on film, as was usually the case with British TV until the 1990s. The quality of the remastering, done by a guy called Peter Crocker, is superlative. In many cases the film elements are long gone and all that exist are SD broadcast masters, telerecordings, and various other badly archived sources. They present the episodes in the best possible quality using the full potential of the Blu-ray format, and do not try to falsely "upscale" them to something they have never been. They look as good as if you were watching a brand new broadcast master.

I do think the issue with SMASH is a Parlophone problem. Look at what they have done to "upscale" David Bowie's appearance on the Old Grey Whistle Test, which was shot on video in a TV studio (like Doctor Who) and used to look perfectly good, now it looks like badly rendered CGI: https://youtu.be/IBgU0tiLy2s

It is interesting that Discovery was presented in SD on DVD. Perhaps Parlophone had a go at upscaling it and the results were awful. Somebody looked at the picture quality so I am surprised that they have released SMASH as it is. It's a real shame.

If anyone is still not sure what those of use banging on about bad upscaling mean, have a look at the bridge and the buildings in "So hard" at 00:29: https://youtu.be/6iv8LXZeNTE

You are right on that. There are some examples of original SD stuff tranfered to HD with impressive results, like all the Top Of The Pops presentations recently aired again...really impressive..but I think it all depends really on the quality of that original SD footage. It seems that masters of this quality are not available for everything, sadly...it´s not "all" in the hnads of the person who make the job..altough, in bad hands, you can destroy the quality. I agree that the job done on some PSB videos is terrible.. For many videos, my PopArt DVD looks better in the same TV, than the Smash versions...
It's really quite simple, it comes down to whether the mastering process includes restoring the original film used in the original creation. If they obtain the raw film, be it digital or analogue, they can ensure there's no degradation between it being edited down to the final product.
With all of the Smash videos, it's plain to see they didn't actually dig up the original film reels and re-edit the videos back together. They must have only post-processed the already heavily compressed and degraded videos. Although a couple videos such as Together are slightly more clear than the Youtube counterpart, it's no 4k full on restoration.

I sincerely, sincerely doubt the 80's music videos (and other decades) weren't filmed on a material that can be restored into HD. Who says it's impossible? I've never heard of this. Feel free to educate me.
All I know is, other artists put in the effort to remaster their videos.
https://youtu.be/LT3cERVRoQo
https://youtu.be/iUrzicaiRLU
https://youtu.be/sOnqjkJTMaA?t=503

I refuse to believe Bilingual wasn't filmed in a higher resolution.
They've clearly cut corners when it came to "upgrading" the music videos for this release.
I remember Neil saying how Miracles had a very expensive budget. It's a shame the release for it is so grainy and down-sampled.

NotInvisible
Posts: 446
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#708 Post by NotInvisible »

DopeFiend wrote: Thu 10 Aug 2023, 6:24 pmIt's really quite simple, it comes down to whether the mastering process includes restoring the original film used in the original creation. If they obtain the raw film, be it digital or analogue, they can ensure there's no degradation between it being edited down to the final product.
Assuming by raw film you mean negative, yes - provided there were no post-production effects added in SD.

But even SD video can be upscaled much better than the Smash discs. Someone brought up the Doctor Who Collection Blu-rays, which are pretty much top-of-the-line for this sort of thing. It's astonishing how good SD video can look with care.
I sincerely, sincerely doubt the 80's music videos (and other decades) weren't filmed on a material that can be restored into HD. Who says it's impossible? I've never heard of this. Feel free to educate me.
Most PSB videos were shot on film during this period, but all the overlays (Love Comes Quickly) and digital effects (Heart) would have to be replicated from scratch. Opportunities (Version 2) was shot on video and could never be true HD. By the time of DJ Culture things get very complicated - the negative wouldn't have the SD CG applied, so you'd need to pay for HD renders and re-composite everything, or more likely replicate the CG from scratch since the original models and project tracks probably no longer exist.
All I know is, other artists put in the effort to remaster their videos.
https://youtu.be/LT3cERVRoQo
https://youtu.be/iUrzicaiRLU
https://youtu.be/sOnqjkJTMaA?t=503
Pet Shop Boys are nowhere near the level of Bowie, ABBA or Michael Jackson. Can you find some true HD videos for artists more on their financial level?

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#709 Post by leesmapman »

Thriller was probably shot on film since it's filmed by John Landis


Last edited by leesmapman on Thu 10 Aug 2023, 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Old Soak
Posts: 973
Joined: Tue 03 Apr 2012, 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#710 Post by Old Soak »

Thanks for confirming that Smash has no value to fans who already own all this stuff multiple times, not even the much mooted video 'upgrades'. It's something to entice the casual listener. They can't even include every single on a seemingly comprehensive collection.
And at the end/ Your funny Uncle staring / At all your friends / With military bearing

NotInvisible
Posts: 446
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#711 Post by NotInvisible »

Old Soak wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023, 11:23 amThanks for confirming that Smash has no value to fans who already own all this stuff multiple times, not even the much mooted video 'upgrades'.
The audio remastering is fantastic - the songs have never sounded better.

User avatar
Old Soak
Posts: 973
Joined: Tue 03 Apr 2012, 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#712 Post by Old Soak »

NotInvisible wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023, 5:19 pm
Old Soak wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023, 11:23 amThanks for confirming that Smash has no value to fans who already own all this stuff multiple times, not even the much mooted video 'upgrades'.
The audio remastering is fantastic - the songs have never sounded better.
Depends on the quality of your system and how old you are - hearing gets worse with age. If all you listen to is streaming via headphones or mp3 quality you aren't getting anything.
And at the end/ Your funny Uncle staring / At all your friends / With military bearing

NotInvisible
Posts: 446
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#713 Post by NotInvisible »

Old Soak wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023, 6:23 pmDepends on the quality of your system and how old you are - hearing gets worse with age. If all you listen to is streaming via headphones or mp3 quality you aren't getting anything.
People can choose to not take advantage of the fantastic remastering, yes. I'm glad this release exists, it sounds terrific.

User avatar
Oznerol
Posts: 2325
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 6:31 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#714 Post by Oznerol »

DopeFiend wrote: Thu 10 Aug 2023, 6:24 pm It's really quite simple, it comes down to whether the mastering process includes restoring the original film used in the original creation. If they obtain the raw film, be it digital or analogue, they can ensure there's no degradation between it being edited down to the final product.
With all of the Smash videos, it's plain to see they didn't actually dig up the original film reels and re-edit the videos back together. They must have only post-processed the already heavily compressed and degraded videos. Although a couple videos such as Together are slightly more clear than the Youtube counterpart, it's no 4k full on restoration.

I sincerely, sincerely doubt the 80's music videos (and other decades) weren't filmed on a material that can be restored into HD. Who says it's impossible? I've never heard of this. Feel free to educate me.
All I know is, other artists put in the effort to remaster their videos.
https://youtu.be/LT3cERVRoQo
https://youtu.be/iUrzicaiRLU
https://youtu.be/sOnqjkJTMaA?t=503

I refuse to believe Bilingual wasn't filmed in a higher resolution.
They've clearly cut corners when it came to "upgrading" the music videos for this release.
I remember Neil saying how Miracles had a very expensive budget. It's a shame the release for it is so grainy and down-sampled.
So you mean than find the probaby lost raw film footage, maybe degraded,maybe without any information of where are the actual shots used for the final video (a master roll of film footage can have 10 versions of every shot or even more), make it all digital in HD for the first time, try to re-create the main edit of the video from scratch and then try to re-create from scratch all the original old analogue-video-effects to make them look identical to the originals, is quite simple?
Believe me that this is impossible in practice, maybe months of work, lots of time and money involved, just to make it look similar, but never identical. (even the basic edit of "Always On My Mind" included on Smash, re-cretared with HD images taken from the recent remaster of the film..is not identical to the original...)

For the exmaples you posted, all are simple film edits, without any video effects... and for ABBA and Michael Jackson its ovbious that those videos were filmed and edited on 35mm, so you only need to re-scan the already edited master of the music video on HD, do some color correction, and that´s it...
I´m 100% sure (well..99%) that this kind of final masters on film never existed for any of the early PSB videos..sadly...
This is not my signature.

Nina
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun 11 Dec 2016, 1:36 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#715 Post by Nina »

Oznerol wrote: Fri 18 Aug 2023, 12:26 am
DopeFiend wrote: Thu 10 Aug 2023, 6:24 pm It's really quite simple, it comes down to whether the mastering process includes restoring the original film used in the original creation. If they obtain the raw film, be it digital or analogue, they can ensure there's no degradation between it being edited down to the final product.
With all of the Smash videos, it's plain to see they didn't actually dig up the original film reels and re-edit the videos back together. They must have only post-processed the already heavily compressed and degraded videos. Although a couple videos such as Together are slightly more clear than the Youtube counterpart, it's no 4k full on restoration.

I sincerely, sincerely doubt the 80's music videos (and other decades) weren't filmed on a material that can be restored into HD. Who says it's impossible? I've never heard of this. Feel free to educate me.
All I know is, other artists put in the effort to remaster their videos.
https://youtu.be/LT3cERVRoQo
https://youtu.be/iUrzicaiRLU
https://youtu.be/sOnqjkJTMaA?t=503

I refuse to believe Bilingual wasn't filmed in a higher resolution.
They've clearly cut corners when it came to "upgrading" the music videos for this release.
I remember Neil saying how Miracles had a very expensive budget. It's a shame the release for it is so grainy and down-sampled.
(even the basic edit of "Always On My Mind" included on Smash, re-cretared with HD images taken from the recent remaster of the film..is not identical to the original...)
Do you have a list of the differences, by any chance?

User avatar
rehmana
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 7:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#716 Post by rehmana »

I wasn't going to buy this due to reasons stated by others - main reason being nothing new so why bother. But then I saw the japanese release of the 3cd 2br comes with a lyric booklet and a signed photo or card. Yes it works out almost double the UK Amazon price (due to postage charges) but I am one of those "completists". Would really bug me in a year or two if I didn't have it. So I figured why not get the one with something extra? Hoping it arrives in a few days.
Although Amazon UK droped the price again for this set. Currently at just under £42 gbp so may have made a mistake buying the Japanese one after all.
Oh well ...

User avatar
telys
Posts: 894
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#717 Post by telys »

rehmana wrote: Thu 24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am Yes it works out almost double the UK Amazon price (due to postage charges) but I am one of those "completists". Would really bug me in a year or two if I didn't have it.
I know the feeling. I missed out on both Lost and Undertow and almost didn't order Cricket Wife...
So it bugs me now
----
You've got me all wrong

User avatar
rehmana
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 7:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#718 Post by rehmana »

Annoyingly Amazon Japan would not allow me to order, and in the end went with hmv japan. Probably could have saved a few quid on another site but sure I won't care about price once I have it. I did see a uk store had the japanese one but wanted over £90 so I think around £70 is ok.

User avatar
DopeFiend
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat 27 Mar 2021, 11:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#719 Post by DopeFiend »

rehmana wrote: Thu 24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am I wasn't going to buy this due to reasons stated by others - main reason being nothing new so why bother. But then I saw the japanese release of the 3cd 2br comes with a lyric booklet and a signed photo or card. Yes it works out almost double the UK Amazon price (due to postage charges) but I am one of those "completists". Would really bug me in a year or two if I didn't have it. So I figured why not get the one with something extra? Hoping it arrives in a few days.
Although Amazon UK droped the price again for this set. Currently at just under £42 gbp so may have made a mistake buying the Japanese one after all.
Oh well ...
I'm not finding anything on this JP version of Smash Blu-ray pack. Can you please link it?
Lyric booklet and signed photo or card does sound pretty sweet.
(I've checked HMV, Amazon JP, and Google)

User avatar
rehmana
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 7:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#720 Post by rehmana »

I found it by watching a japanese unboxing video. So I looked and found on amazon japan

https://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%83%9A%E3%8 ... 394&sr=8-2

If you look in the description it talks about the lyrics booklet. I think i then found another site where i could see the parlophone was the uk one and the warner japan one was this one. So then i ordered from hmv japan -

https://www.hmv.co.jp/artist_Pet-Shop-B ... y_13901797

Hope the links help

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 7 guests