Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
Ramzy
Posts: 900
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 2:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#271 Post by Ramzy »

tottenhammattspurs wrote: Sat 30 Nov 2024, 11:39 am nonetheless is at #6 in the sales chart and #7 in the physical charts, where units ACTUALLY matter.
I mean I'd like this to be true because it would favour the specific bands that I like at the expense of hugely more popular ones, but wishing for a chart without streaming today is like wishing for a chart without CDs in 1995. Streaming is the way people (including people who pay for music) overwhelmingly consume songs and albums and has been for more than a decade - there might be a discussion about whether the algorithms are right (there was an interesting opinion piece in the Metro about this the other day, saying the singles chart has become basically irrelevant because of the dominance of the same few records - which I agree with) but on a wider level I don't think the charts should only reflect the buying habits of a tiny minority just because it would reflect well on bands like PSB. One reason I think the performance of the recent albums is something to be proud of is that they've done well in a chart dominated by streaming and much younger artists - Hotspot did two weeks in the top 20, their first studio album since Bilingual to do so, and Nonetheless was their best peak for a studio album in 31 years with streaming in the equation.
I must disengage your recreational music.

User avatar
telys
Posts: 1765
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#272 Post by telys »

I've listened through the demo album (it finally arrived).
There are certainly elements from the demoes that they could've used on the produced album, especially on Loneliness. The voice is generally better on the finished album than on the demoes.

But I also think they could've fiddled around with elements from the demoes on the single/radio versions. There is room for alternative versions.
----
You've got me all wrong

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 1687
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#273 Post by Gabby »

telys wrote: Tue 03 Dec 2024, 10:41 am I've listened through the demo album (it finally arrived).
There are certainly elements from the demoes that they could've used on the produced album, especially on Loneliness. The voice is generally better on the finished album than on the demoes.

But I also think they could've fiddled around with elements from the demoes on the single/radio versions. There is room for alternative versions.
Very succinctly put. 💯 agree

User avatar
Xakrij
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue 13 Dec 2016, 1:11 am
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#274 Post by Xakrij »

Expanded CD arrived today in Atlanta. Shipped 25 Nov via UPS Mail innovations and delivered via USPS. Ordered from US Store.
I'm current on all items for the time being.
Shot in the fatal cause 'of frock-and-droll'

User avatar
Old Soak
Posts: 1196
Joined: Tue 03 Apr 2012, 11:06 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#275 Post by Old Soak »

Ramzy wrote: Sun 01 Dec 2024, 7:06 pm
tottenhammattspurs wrote: Sat 30 Nov 2024, 11:39 am nonetheless is at #6 in the sales chart and #7 in the physical charts, where units ACTUALLY matter.
I mean I'd like this to be true because it would favour the specific bands that I like at the expense of hugely more popular ones, but wishing for a chart without streaming today is like wishing for a chart without CDs in 1995. Streaming is the way people (including people who pay for music) overwhelmingly consume songs and albums and has been for more than a decade - there might be a discussion about whether the algorithms are right (there was an interesting opinion piece in the Metro about this the other day, saying the singles chart has become basically irrelevant because of the dominance of the same few records - which I agree with) but on a wider level I don't think the charts should only reflect the buying habits of a tiny minority just because it would reflect well on bands like PSB. One reason I think the performance of the recent albums is something to be proud of is that they've done well in a chart dominated by streaming and much younger artists - Hotspot did two weeks in the top 20, their first studio album since Bilingual to do so, and Nonetheless was their best peak for a studio album in 31 years with streaming in the equation.
Streaming is sh@t. It's good enough for previewing tracks. It's killed visit levels to actual town centres, accounts for 3% of the world's electricity demand and means fat lazy kids hardly leave their bedroom as everything is available now. It's meant the majority of artists struggle to make a living from sales so pushed concert ticket prices up to ridiculous levels. Its driven poor quality loudness wars and artificially promoted 'safe' corporate artists through algorithms. Its diminished the album format. Its a huge part if why modern life is rubbish and Room 101 territory. Balls to streaming.
And at the end/ Your funny Uncle staring / At all your friends / With military bearing

herts101
Posts: 246
Joined: Wed 17 Aug 2005, 5:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#276 Post by herts101 »

Old Soak wrote:
Streaming is sh@t. It's good enough for previewing tracks. It's killed visit levels to actual town centres, accounts for 3% of the world's electricity demand and means fat lazy kids hardly leave their bedroom as everything is available now. It's meant the majority of artists struggle to make a living from sales so pushed concert ticket prices up to ridiculous levels. Its driven poor quality loudness wars and artificially promoted 'safe' corporate artists through algorithms. Its diminished the album format. Its a huge part if why modern life is rubbish and Room 101 territory. Balls to streaming.
Streaming is great. It’s put most of the music ever created in my pocket. It means I don’t have to trudge all the way to a crappy town centre to buy the music I want, saves on fuel usage due to all those journeys no longer being necessary and means kids listen to more and more great music in their bedrooms.
As I pay less for music than in the past I can use that saving to go and enjoy some amazing gigs and experience music live as well as recorded.
Playlists mean new listeners experience music from 7 decades of creativity, rather than just what a small set of record stores push and allow me to create my own “albums” with infinite variety.
It’s a huge part of why modern life is great - and I can still go and buy a vinyl when I want. Hooray for streaming.
Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NotInvisible
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#277 Post by NotInvisible »

The reality of course is that most people aren’t listening to playlists incorporating 70 years of pop music, they’re listening to narrowly selected silos of safe pablum carefully picked by algorithms, reflecting what corporate pop wants to push at any given time.

You have access to more music than ever for cheaper than ever, which comes on the back of most artists having no real chance to make a living.

And while it’s conceptually cool to be able to stay in your room and listen to a compressed stream on shitty speakers, the loss of social interaction is a widespread phenomenon that we now know is having devastating effects on culture and community.

Streaming is shit.

User avatar
telys
Posts: 1765
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#278 Post by telys »

Streaming is shit. Being able to download is not.
I can't understand why people stream instead of downloading and owning the digital stuff themselves and not being subjected to algorithms.
----
You've got me all wrong

herts101
Posts: 246
Joined: Wed 17 Aug 2005, 5:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#279 Post by herts101 »

Yeah I know - I had my tongue very firmly in my cheek and agree with many of the arguments.

But - personally I do love the ability to listen to music whenever I want on the go, and my kids listen to way more older music than I ever did. Some of that is the history of pop music now being longer than it was in the 80s, but it’s also due to access which I never had.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NotInvisible
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#280 Post by NotInvisible »

herts101 wrote: Wed 04 Dec 2024, 12:25 pmBut - personally I do love the ability to listen to music whenever I want on the go.
This is actually my primary reason for avoiding streaming. I fly a lot for work, and streaming is impossible. Add to this the gaps in most artists' discographies re: b-sides, remixes and ancillary tracks and it turns out having music directly on my phone is the superior choice.
herts101 wrote:and my kids listen to way more older music than I ever did. Some of that is the history of pop music now being longer than it was in the 80s, but it’s also due to access which I never had.
Your kids are statistical aberrations, though. Contemporary playlists are driven largely by "what fits in this box" algorithms which mitigate against the inclusion of older music, different genres, or even more left-field music within the primary genre itself. And in any case the pre-streaming world had its share of kids listening to their parents' oldies, the Doors/Zeppelin crowd found in every high school etc. Let's be honest, most kids aren't listening to 20th century tunes.

somdigital
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed 28 Dec 2011, 10:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#281 Post by somdigital »

While I still have full hearing capabilities, I will listen to CDs and flac files, putting away mp3 and streaming. I still can hear subtil differences on my (fantastic) headphones.
Luckly, I can put flac files into my car and listen with full spectrum speakers.
Yes to digital audio, but in flac, please!

User avatar
Too Many Shadows
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat 11 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#282 Post by Too Many Shadows »

somdigital wrote: Wed 04 Dec 2024, 7:03 pm While I still have full hearing capabilities, I will listen to CDs and flac files, putting away mp3 and streaming. I still can hear subtil differences on my (fantastic) headphones.
Luckly, I can put flac files into my car and listen with full spectrum speakers.
Yes to digital audio, but in flac, please!
A hard but unscientifically tested agree from me, mostly. Since the dawn of digital, this has been a discussion laden with caveats. FLAC placed up againt CD placed up against lossless streaming. All are possibly equivalent if they all are sourced from the same master; however, how often does that happen? Garbage in, garbage out.
Look at my hopes, look at my dreams...

Neilatrone
Posts: 290
Joined: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 9:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#283 Post by Neilatrone »

Think we're straying off topic.....

User avatar
telys
Posts: 1765
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#284 Post by telys »

Neilatrone wrote: Wed 04 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm Think we're straying off topic.....
Great title for a PSB song
----
You've got me all wrong

Nervous Boy
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri 11 Jun 2021, 2:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Nonetheless - Expanded Edition

#285 Post by Nervous Boy »

Pitchfork finally bothered to review the album and give it an 8.

https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/pe ... d-edition/

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests