deleted

The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021 . Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible per...

The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021 . Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible per...

The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021 . Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible per...

The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021 . Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible per...

The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021 . Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible per...

The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021 . Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible per...

TallThinMan wrote: ↑Sat 15 May 2021, 11:37 pm What’s the point of having moderators who won’t moderate?

Who is having them? They have us here .

And how many songwriters that don't perform on the record are actually credited as the performing artist? Wait, why "don't perform"? They say: " It is true that Pet Shop Boys had been asked to be part of the performance ". The whole fuss is about that they didn't perform — in wh...

Patrick Bateman wrote: ↑Sat 15 May 2021, 1:03 am Why would they be credited if they only produced it? Stuart Price isn't credited.

Because they also wrote it in the first place.

Assuming Neil was also going to sing on the track you could reasonably use the balance of vocals to decide the order. It seems quite odd for an artist to release/perform a cover version of their own song together with someone else. Where it takes place, it would feel even more odd to put that artis...

The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021 . Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible per...

Spittingcat wrote: ↑Thu 13 May 2021, 1:37 pm You can't buy anything from that gig, can you? No music download, no DVD.

Highlights VHS, LD. Welcome to 1989

But I don't get the point. Why not being able to buy anything from that gig makes it sensible to refer to it now, in the context of the Elton/Olly performance?

Royalties, record labels.. How does the "It’s a sin 1989" post fit in with those?

canveyboy wrote: ↑Thu 13 May 2021, 6:57 am No contract issues would prevent PSB from saying how much they loved Elton and Olly’s performance.

Exactly.

Which means they didn't.